Free Hit Counter Visitors to these pages since 12-29-97
By Glenn R. Morton
Copyright 2001
http://home.entouch.net/dmd/oswald.htm
This may be freely distributed so long as no alterations are made to the page or no financial charges assessed for the reader.
Free Hit Counter
Visitors to these pages since 12-29-97
visitors to the oil pages since 8-19-04
Related Pages:
“What is black, sticky, comes in large tubs and causes depressions?
No, not Marmite. Here is a string of numbers as a clue: 1974, 1979, 1991,
2000”
“The answer is oil—and,
more precisely, large rises in the price of oil.” Andrew Oswald, “Oil
Price Puts Skids Under Growth,” The Sunday Times, Sept. 2, 2001, p. 4
1.
While our economies are more efficient than they used to be, we are not less
dependent upon oil. Oswald points out that we are not less dependent upon oil
but more dependent than any time in history.
We use more energy consuming products than our grandparents did. In the
1960s the world went through 20 million barrels a day, it was 60 million in 1980
and today it exceeds 75 million.
2.
The second myth is that oil price rises have minimal effect on jobs or economic
growth. Oswald criticizes Alan
Greenspan for increasing American interest rates last year just as the
oil-induced recession was beginning to appear. He points out that economic
models don’t incorporate oil price but it is the best predictor of what will
happen to the economy.
3.
This is in my opinion the most wide spread myth. It is that oil prices don’t
matter because there are lots of other sources of energy.
Oil price underpins all other energy prices. While oil price rose 3 times from 1999 to 2000, natural gas
rose 50% just this year.
4.
There was no real harm done by last year’s oil price rise. Due to the time it
takes for energy prices to work through the economy, it will be early next year
before the full effect on employment is felt.
5.
The myth that there are plenty of substitutes
for oil is one that the environmental lobby promulgates. Oswald points out that
while we might be able to drive solar-powered cars, they can’t take goods and
people across the ocean. There is
no substitute for jet fuel.
6.
There is nothing to worry about in the long term.
He points out that discoveries of oil do not respond to price, that the
US production peaked forever in 1970. And then he points out that when China
begins to use automobiles (which it is on the verge of) the demand, and thus the
price, for oil will skyrocket. That will certainly cause more recession.
What
he doesn’t throw into his calculations is that the world is about to peak out
production.
reference
http://www.sunday-times.co.uk/news/pages/sti/2001/09/02/stibusecn03002.html