My Blog on Global Warming issues http://themigrantmind.blogspot.com/
http://home.entouch.net/dmd/gaps.htm
Free Hit Counter
Visitors to these pages since
12-29-97
The archaeological and fossil record is very spotty. And this is especially true when one is at the time period close to when either a technology is invented or when a new species/genus arises. The reason for this spottiness is that just after a new invention or new species arises, they are localized in a tiny region and they are very few in number. Only when the technology or species becomes widespread and numerous do we have a continuous archaeological/paleontological record of the species/technology. To find the earliest example of a given species, one must know where to look, or be lucky enough to look in the right place by accident.
Secondly, when a species is rare, it is unlikely that they will meet a death which will fossilize them. Only when a species becomes widespread will it be likely that a local flood will bury the creature in a fashion consistent with preservation.
Given these facts, it is not unreasonable to know that the time of earliest example of any species is simply not the time when the species arose. The species arose at some earlier time. The earliest find of a species is just that--the earliest find. Probabilistically, it has been shown that one can expect the time of origin of a species to be 1.3 times the age of the earliest specimen.
I
ran into the following in Colin Tudge's book which concerns what kind of gap you
can expect between the actual speciation event and the first appearance of that
species in the fossil record.
"Logic dictates, too, that the oldest known fossils cannot possibly
be the oldest representatives of
their kind. Fossilization is a rare
event, after all; and when animals first appear, they are rare.
The earliest fossil bones are therefore likely to date from a time when
their erstwhile owners were already common.
Logic similarly dictates that if an animal is particularly unlikely to
form fossils--as primates seem to be--then paleontologists are particularly
unlikely to find the very earliest types. In
fact, this logic can be translated into a mathematical formula (see Robert D.
Martin, ""Primate Origins: Plugging the
Gaps,"" Nature, May 20, 1993, pp 223-234). The fewer fossils there are (relative to the calculated number of extinct species), the
older the group is liable to be,
relative to the number of fossils found."" ~ Colin Tudge, The Time Before
History, (New York: Scribner, 1996), p. 172
The
article that Tudge cites, presents
a statistical study in which a model phylogenetic tree is designed and 3% of the
species in the full model end up as fossils (this is consistent with
fossil data) The phylogenetic model
begins at 16 million years ago. But
due to the incomplete sampling (i.e. fossilization) the earliest example of the
model appears around 11 myr. This of course underestimates
the time of origin for the phylogeny by 5 million years. This is a
30% underestimate in time for the origin of the model.
So
when we find H. erectus being widespread at a little under 2 million years, we
can be very confident that he existed earlier.
How much earlier? We don't
know but the earliest member of the genus Homo is dated at 2.3 myr
(AL-666) Even a 30% underestimate moves the origin of our genus 3.3 Myr.
And we must remember that there is a possibility that the underestimate is
bigger as is obvious in some of the cases I show below.
The earliest fossil H. erectus is extremely unlikely to be the very first H. erectus that ever existed on earth. H. erectus or something not to much unlike him MUST have existed prior to 2 million years. First, H. erectus appears all over the place (Java, Georgia and Africa between 1.6-1.8 million years ago. Migration from the original homeland would take some time. Secondly, often the earliest examples of any item in the fossil record is eventually replaced by an even earlier example, but there is a big gap in time between the first and second occurrence. In 1958 the oldest H. erectus was dated at 500 kyr at Beijing and Java. Then in the 60s H. erectus was pushed back to 1.5 million years with almost no evidence of his existence over the intervening million years. Since then many discoveries have filled in the gap.
The data below shows the gaps between the first and second examples of various items in the fossil and archeological record. Each entry comes from the scientific announcement of a new 'oldest' specimen. The previous 'oldest' specimen now becomes the second oldest specimen and the time in between these two specimens become the reported gap. The interesting thing about these gaps is that there is absolutely no evidence that the species/item/technology existed during the gap period. Indeed, if it weren't for the new discovery, there would be no evidence that the species/item/technology existed prior to the now second oldest specimen.
Here is the data. As you look at this, realize that in my views, I am only looking for a 3.5 million year gap between when I claim the flood is and the earliest evidence of H. erectus. [kyr=thousand years;myr=million years; Gyr= billion years]
species/item/technology Oldest 2nd oldest gap ref.
Mayan Ball courts 3.4 kyr
2.9 kyr .5 kyr
47
Chess in Europe 1.4
kyr .9 kyr
.5 kyr 11
Irish Elk (youngest two) 10.6 kyr 9.2 kyr
1.4 kyr 14
Maya
Farming
4.5 kyr 3.0 kyr 1.5
kyr 1
wine
5.2 kyr 3.2 kyr 2.0
kyr 3
Maize cultivation 7.7 kyr
5.2 kyr 2.5 kyr
8
Peruvian carving of God 4 kyr
1 kyr 3 kyr
12
Moon
map
5 kyr .5 kyr
4.5 kyr 9
New World Farming 10 kyr
5 kyr 5 kyr
8
cotton
7 kyr 2 kyr
5 kyr 10
glue
14.7 kyr 8.5 kyr 6.2
kyr 6
pet
cats
9.5 kyr 3.0 kyr
6.5 kyr 58
Use of
Bitumen
40 kyr 10 kyr 30
kyr 7
use of bitumen
40 kyr 8.2 kyr
31.8 kyr 2
Foraminifera Ammodiscus 510 myr 440
myr 70 myr 13
stone
tools
2.6 Myr 2.3
Myr 200 kyr 4
humans & tools together 2.3 Myr 1.8
Myr 500 kyr 5
Cetaceans
53.5 Myr 50
Myr 3.5 Myr 51
bisexual plants 465
Myr 460
Myr 5
Myr 42
Elephantine animals 60
Myr 52
Myr 8
Myr 38
birds
147 Myr 139
Myr 8
Myr 27
Angiosperms
140 Myr 130
Myr 10 Myr 52
Earliest vertebrate 530
Myr 520
Myr 10 Myr 39
Marine turtles
110 Myr 100
Myr 10 Myr 46
Forest fire charcoal 360 Myr 350
Myr 10 Myr 20
Dinosaurs
240 Myr 228
Myr 12 Myr 24
Grasses
55 Myr 37
Myr 18 Myr 45
Tetrapods
365 Myr 355
Myr 20 Myr 16
Thrips
230 Myr 210
Myr 20 Myr 35
Moths
230 Myr 210
Myr 20 Myr 35
Diptera (butterflies) 250 Myr 230
Myr 20 Myr 35
Coleoptera
250 Myr 230
Myr 20 Myr 35
Tyrannosaurus
125 Myr 105
Myr 20 Myr 36
Lorises
40 Myr 20 MYr
22 Myr 21
tribosphenic mammals 167 Myr 143
Myr 25 Myr 53
Australian
songbirds 55 Myr 30
Myr 25 Myr 28
Tarsiers
55 Myr 25
Myr 30 Myr 25
Sponges
580 Myr 549
Myr 31 Myr 44
Myriapods
410 Myr 375
Myr 35 Myr 49
Pollen eaters
150 Myr 110
Myr 40 Myr 43
Ants
92
Myr 52
Myr 40 Myr 19
Ticks
90 Myr 40
Myr 50 Myr 18
Chordate
530 Myr 480
Myr 50 Myr 55
Thelodont fish
455 Myr 430
Myr 50 Myr 32
Vascular
plants 470
Myr 420
Myr 50 Myr 33
Spiders
295 Myr 240
Myr 55 Myr 34
Mycorrhizal
fungi 460 Myr
400 Myr 60 Myr
17
therizinosaur
200 Myr 140
Myr 60 Myr 50
African turtles 205
Myr 145
Myr 60 Myr 26
Gilled mushrooms 94
Myr 30
Myr 64 Myr 30
Crawfish
280 Myr 215
Myr 65 Myr 48
Birds on Madagascar 65
Myr 10 Kyr
65 Myr 37
mammalian flight 125 Myr
51 Myr 70 Myr
59
spider
silk
120 Myr 40
Myr 80 Myr 22
Land-Plant interactions 412 Myr 322
Myr 90 Myr 29
Caecilians
180 Myr 80
Myr 100 Myr 57
Snails
300 Myr 140
Myr 160 Myr 40
Tardigrades
510 Myr 310
Myr 200 Myr 15
Nucha
sponges
510 Myr 230
Myr 280 Myr 54
Life on
land
1.2 Gyr 800
Myr 400 Myr 23
deep-sea vent community 420 Myr 10 kyr
420 Myr 41
crustal subduction 2 Gyr
1.1 Gyr 900 Myr 31
Eukaryotes
2.7 Gyr 1.7 Gyr 1000
Myr 56
References
1. B. Bower "Maya Beginnings Extend Back at Belize Site," Science News, April 30, 1994, p. 279
2. Eric Boeda, et al, "Bitumen as a Hafting Material on Middle Palaeolithic Artefacts," Nature, 380, March 28, 1996, p. 336-337
3. Sue Goetinck, "It probably wasn't a fine wine, but it certainly was aged well," Dallas Morning News, Monday, June 10, 1996, p 6D.
4. Bernard Wood, "The Oldest Whodunnit in the World," Nature, 385( Jan.23, 1997), p. 292
5.W. H. Kimbel et al, "Late Pliocene Homo and Oldowan Tools from the Hadar Formation (Kada Hadar member), Ethiopia," Journal of Human Evolution,31(1996):549-561, p. 559
6.
Josephine
Flood, "The Archeology of the Dreamtime, (New Haven: Yale University
Press, 1989), p. 101
7. Christopher Wills, The Children of Prometheus, (Reading, Mass: Perseus Books, 1998), p.143-14
8. Heather Pringle, “The Slow Birth of Agriculture,” Science, 282(1998):1446-1450, p. 1446-147
9. http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/sci/tech/newsid_325000/325290.stm April 22, 1999 accessed April 23, 1999
10. Ian Sample, “Cotton Thread Runs Unbroken through Prehistory,” New Scientist, Sept 7, 2002, p. 13
11. Jocelyn Selim, “A Strategic Advance on Europe,” Discover, Nov. 2002, p. 11
12. http://www.nature.com/nsu/030414/030414-4.html accessed 4-16-03
13. Stephen J. Culver, “Early Cambrian Foraminifera from West Africa,” Science 254(1991):689-691, p. 690
14. Silvia Gonzalez, Andrew C. Kitchner & Adrian M. Lister, "Survival of the Irish elk into the Holocene", Nature 405, 753 - 754 (2000)
15. Ida Thompson and Douglas S. Jones, "A Possible Onychophoran from the Middle Pennsylvanian Mazon Creek Beds of Northern Illinois,” Journal of Paleontology, 54:3:588-596, p. 593
16. Edward B. Daeschler et al,
"A Devonian Tetrapod from North America." Science, July 29,
1994, p. 639-641. p. 641
17.
Alexandra
Witze, “Fungi, plants apparently have 460-million-year-old alliance,” Dallas
Morning News, Monday, Sept. 18, 2000, p. F1
19. S. Perkins, “Fossil Find Extends Ant’s Ancient Lineage,” Science News, 158(2000):p. 343
20.
Walter
L. Cressler, III, “Evidence of Earliest Known Wildfires,” Palaios,
16(2001):171-174, p. 171
21. Erik R. Seiffert, Elwyn L. Simons and Yousry Attia, "Fossil Evidence for an Ancient Divergence of Lorises and Galagos," Nature, 422(2003):321-424.
22. http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/3129777.stm accessed 8-8/03
23. Robert J. Horodyski and L. Paul Knauth, "Life on Land in the Precambrian," Science, Jan. 28, 1994, p. 494‑498. see also "When Life First Sprouted on Land," Science News, March 12, 1994, p. 173
24. Matt Crenson, "Geologists report oldest sign of Dinosaurs in North America," Dallas Morning News, May 9, 1994, p. 8D
25. R. D. Martin, "Bonanza at Shanghuang," Nature, 368, April 14, 1994, p. 586
26. Eugene S. Gaffney and James W.
Kitching, "The Most Ancient African Turtle," Nature, 369, May
5, 1994, p. 55.
27. Paul C. Sereno and Rao Chenggang, "Early Evolution of Avian Flight and Perching: New Evidence from the Lower Cretaceous of China," Science, Feb. 14, 1992, p. 845
28. Matt Crenson, "Australian Fossils suggest songbirds evolved in the Southern Hemisphere," Dallas Morning News, March 6, 1995, p. 9d
29.
Dianne Edwards, et al,
"Coprolites as evidence for Plant-Animal Interaction in Siluro-Devonian
Terrestrial Ecosystems," Nature, Sept. 28, 1995, p. 329
30.
D. S. Hibbett, D. Grimaldi,
and M. J. Donoghue, "Cretaceous Mushrooms in Amber," Nature,
377, Oct. 12, 1995, p. 487
31 Andreas Moller, et al,
"Evidence for a 2 GA subduction zone: Eclogites in the Usagaran belt of
Tanzania," Geology, Dec. 1995, p. 1067
32. R. Monastersky, "The
first shark: To Bite or Not to Bite?" Science News, 149, Feb. 17,
1996, p. 101
33. Chongyang Cal, Shu Ouyang, Yi Wang, Zongjie Fang, Jiayu Rong Liangyu Geng and Xingxue Li "An Early Silurian Vascular Plant," Nature, 379, Feb. 15, 1996, p. 592
34.Paul A. Selden, "Fossil mesothele spiders," Nature, 379, Feb. 8, 1996, p. 498
35. Nicholas C. Fraser et al, "A Triassic Lagerstatte from eastern North America," Nature, 380, April 18, 1996, p.615
36.
"Fossil may be oldest known
tyrannosaur", Dallas Morning News, June 24, 1996, p. 10D
37. Catherine A. Forster, et al, "The First Cretaceous Bird from Madagascar," Nature 382, August 8, 1996, p. 534
38.Emmanuel Gheerbrant, Jean
Sudre and Henri Cappetta, "A Palaeocene Proboscidean from Morocco," Nature,
383, (Sept. 5, 1996), p. 68-70, p. 68-69
39. R. Monastersky "Early Kin of Vertebrates found in China," Science News, 150, Nov. 16, 1996, p. 311
40. Colin Little, The Terrestrial Invasion, (New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990), p. 11-12
41. C.T.S. Little, et al, "Silurian Hydrothermal-vent Community from the Southern Urals, Russia," Nature, 385, Jan. 9, 1997, p. 146-148, p. 146
42. Monique Feist and Raimund Feist, "Oldest Record of a Bisexual Plant," Nature, Jan. 30, 1997, p. 401
43. http://sciencenow.sciencemag.org/html/970508d.htm accessed May 8, 1997
44.
Chia-Wei Li, Jun-Yuan Chen and
Tzu-En Hua, "Precambrian Sponges with Cellular Structures," Science
279(1998):879-882, p. 879
45. William L. Crepet and Gwen D. Feldman, "The Earliest Remains of Grasses in the Fossil Record," American Journal of Botany, 78(1991):7: 1010-1014, p. 1010
46.
Henry
Gee, “the Eyes
Have It,’ Nature,
392(1998):651.
47 W. D. Hill, M. Blake and J. E. Clark, “Ball Court Design Dates back 3,400 Years,’ Nature, 392(1998):878-879, p. 878
48.
Loren E. Babcock
et al, "Paleozoic-Mesozoic Crayfish from Antarctica: Earliest Evidence of
Freshwater Decapod Crustaceans," Geology 26(1998):6:539-542, p. 539
49. Gregory D. Edgecombe, "Devonian Terrestrial Arthropods from Gondwana," Nature, 394(1998): 172-175, p. 172
50.
Xijin Zhao, Xing
Xu, "The Oldest Coelurosaurian," Nature 394(1998) p. 234
51.
Sunil Bajpai* and
Philip D. Gingerich, "A new Eocene
archaeocete (Mammalia, Cetacea) from India and the time of origin of
whales,"
PNAS Vol. 95,
Issue 26, 15464-15468, December 22, 1998
52. Ge Sun, David L. Dilcher, Shaoling Zhen, Zhekun Zhou, “In Search of the First Flower : A Jurassic Angiosperm, Archaefructus, from Northeast China,” Science 282(1998):1692-1695, p. 1692
53.
G. D. Stanley Jr.
“A Triassic Sponge from Vancouver Island: Possible Holdover from the
Cambrian,” Can. J. Earth Sci. 35(1998):9, p.1037-1043, in Petroleum
Abstracts, #693,612 March 6, 1999, p. 771
54. JOHN J. FLYNN, J. MICHAEL PARRISH, BERTHE RAKOTOSAMIMANANA, WILLIAM F. SIMPSON & ANDRÉ R. WYSS, "A Middle Jurassic mammal from Madagascar." Nature 401, 57 - 60 (2 September 1999) ;John J. Flynn et al, “A Middle Jurassic Mammal from Madagascar,” Nature, 401(1999):57-60, p. 60
55.
JEFF
DONN,"Oldest Vertebrates Believed Found," Associated Press, NOVEMBER 04, 01:51
EST
56.
Richard
Monastersky, "Earliest Evidence of Complex Life,” Science News,
156(1999):141; Jochen J. Brocks et al, “Archean Molecular Fossils and the
Early Rise of Eukaryotes,” Science, 285(1999):1033-1036, p. 1035
57. Science News, Oct. 27, 1990, p. 270
58. http://www.boston.com/news/odd/articles/2004/04/09/first_pet_cat_found_in_tomb/ accessed 4-9-2004